ASSIGNMENT代写

英国印第安纳代写Assignment:共同的责任

2019-01-25 00:43

罗斯把这些定义为共同的责任(但绝不是绝对的),无论情况如何都要坚持。例如,为了慈善的责任,承诺的义务可以被忽略。根据罗斯义务论伦理的变化,麦金农对军事机器的黑客行为可能只有在他履行个人责任去发现UFO存在的真相(慈善的责任)的情况下才有正当理由。但是在这样做的时候,忽略了尊重他人个人财产的义务(非恶意的义务)。应用义务论框架的主要问题是确定行为的意图,这也被麦金农尚未被起诉的事实所破坏。麦金农的真实性可能会受到质疑,因为他有偏见;他可能会说任何话来逃避可能的引渡和监禁判决。检察官提出的一些建议坚称麦金农造成了价值70万美元的损失。在这个框架下,他的行为的后果被忽视(康德,1785),然而这可能表明他的意图不仅仅是寻找UFO技术。麦金农的行为是不合理的,如果他的意图是造成损害。如果我们可以假设麦金农的行为只是为了寻找证据那么义务论框架就会规定这在道德上是合理的。然而,如果把肯特的观点加以考虑,那么就不能断定黑客攻击寻找秘密技术是普遍正当的。
英国印第安纳代写Assignment:共同的责任
Ross defines these as common duties (but in no way absolute) to be upheld regardless of the situation. For example the duty of promise-keeping may be ignored for the duty of beneficence. In light of Ross’s variation of deontological ethics, McKinnon’s hacking of military machines may only be justified under the reason that he was acting upon his personal duty to find out the truth about UFO existence (the duty of beneficence). But in doing so, ignoring the duty to respect other’s personal property (the duty of non-maleficence). The predominant issue with applying a deontological framework is identifying the intent of an action, this is also somewhat marred by the fact that McKinnon has not yet been charged. McKinnon’s truthfulness may be contested because he is bias; he would likely say anything to get out of facing a possible extradition and prison sentence. There are suggestions brought forward from his prosecutors that insist McKinnon caused $700,000 worth of damage. The consequences of his action are disregarded under this framework (Kant, 1785), yet this may suggest that his intentions were not simply to find UFO technology. McKinnon’s actions would not be justifiable if his intentions were to cause damage. If it can be assumed that McKinnon’s actions were only to search for evidence then a deontological frame would dictate this is ethically justifiable. However, if Kants view is taken into consideration then is cannot be judged that hacking to search for secret technologies is universally justified.