美国亚利桑那代写Assignment:正义感的人

2019-02-26 16:29

通过宣称自己不感兴趣，梅杰开始通过暗示自己的行为是任何有正义感的人的行为来说服别人，而不仅仅是“打猎的少数人”。梅杰的整个演讲试图通过嘲讽和否定来说服人们，暗示工党政府正在牺牲少数人的权利，“这是政治私利压倒自然正义的惊人例证”。梅杰的说服策略，面对压倒一切的公众反对猎狐，是对这一事实提出质疑，并强调狩猎作为农村经济的一部分的重要性。他指的“农民”和“国家居民以及失去生计的同时避免提及“猎人们称作面红耳赤的花花公子的形象”,蔑视引用视图的左边,直到他论证了基于意见而不是事实和结论猎狐的去地球,甚至提到圣诞节,在演讲时,帮助其说服力。此外，主要国家认为，一个人需要一个“开放的头脑”来看到他的论点的真相，这意味着那些不同意他的人有一个有限的观点，基于呼吁大众的愿望，而不是常识或正义。2003年“费边社”,托尼•布莱尔(Tony Blair)采用类似的方法当谈到公共服务等思想感情的想法,他提到“创建国家卫生服务”进一步他的论点,他的政府是“交付(ing)进步的权利,其他国家认为理所当然的。演讲前后连贯，承认他的听众拥有社会党(Socialist Party)的历史知识。从这个意义上说，他为更普通的听众量身打造的演讲结构与演讲截然不同。
美国亚利桑那代写Assignment:正义感的人
By declaring his disinterest, Major begins to persuade by suggesting that his is the action of any right-thinking man, not just ‘the minority’ of ‘countrymen who hunt’. Major’s entire speech attempts to persuade by derision and negation, implying that the Labour Government is sacrificing the rights of the few, ‘a breath-taking illustration of political self-interest overriding natural justice’. Major’s persuasive tactic, faced with an overriding popular opposition to fox-hunting, is to cast doubt on this as a fact and also to stress the importance of hunting as part of the rural economy. He refers to ‘farmers’ and ‘country dwellers’ as well as loss of ‘livelihood’ whilst avoiding reference to ‘the image of huntsmen as red-faced toffs’, a disparaging reference to the view of the Left, until after he has delivered an argument based on opinion rather than fact and concluding with the fox-hunting term of ‘gone to earth’ and even reference to the Christmas season, when the speech was delivered, to aid its persuasiveness. Moreover, Major states that one needs an ‘open mind’ to see the truth of his argument implying that those who do not agree with him have a restricted view based on the desire to appeal to the populace rather than common sense or justice.Speaking to the ‘Fabian Society’ in 2003, Tony Blair employed a similar methodology when speaking of Public Services where he alluded to such ideologically emotive ideas as ‘the creation of the National Health Service’ to further his argument that his government was ‘deliver[ing] the progressive rights that other countries took for granted’. The speech is argued coherently, acknowledging the historical knowledge of the Socialist Party his audience possesses. In this sense, he tailors the structure very differently from a speech to a more general audience.