美国德克萨斯代写作业:抽象的正义

2018-11-01 23:52

此外,由法官决定“将取决于,不仅在他的信仰的这些原则优越的抽象的正义,也应遵循,政治的公平,在一个社区成员的道德信仰他的同胞”。[18] Dworkin还用更一般的术语解释了这一点:“有两种可能性。有人可能会说，对社会实践的解释意味着发现实践中其他社会参与者的目的或意图(…)。或者，它意味着发现社区的目的，而社区是实践的场所，它被设想为拥有某种形式的精神生活或群体意识。第一个建议似乎更有吸引力，因为不那么神秘。但它被论证性社会实践的内部结构排除了，因为这是这种实践的一个特征解释声明不仅仅是关于其他人的想法的声明。(…)[A]社会实践创造并假定了一个关键的区别，即以这种方式，一个一个地解释参与者的行为和思想，以及解释这种实践本身，即，解释他们共同做什么。它假定了这种区别，因为参与者所作的声明和争论，得到了实践的许可和鼓励，是关于它的含义，而不是它们的含义。因此，口译员必须参加他想要了解的练习.
美国德克萨斯代写作业:抽象的正义
Furthermore, decision making by the judge “will depend, that is, not only on his beliefs about which of these principles is superior as a matter of abstract justice but also about which should be followed, as a matter of political fairness, in a community whose members have the moral convictions his fellow citizens have”. [18] Dworkin also explains this in more general terms: “There are two possibilities. Someone might say that interpretation of a social practice means discovering the purposes or intentions of the other social participants in the practice (…). Or that it means discovering the purposes of the community that houses the practice, conceived as itself having some form of mental life or group consciousness. The first of these suggestions seems more attractive because less mysterious. But it is ruled out by the internal structure of an argumentative social practice, because it is a feature of such practices that an interpretive claim is not just a claim about what other interpreters think. (…) [A] social practice creates and assumes a crucial distinction between interpreting the acts and thoughts of participants one by one, in that way, and interpreting that practice itself, that is, interpreting what they do collectively. It assumes that distinction because the claims and arguments participants make, licensed and encouraged by the practice, are about what it means, not what they mean. (…) [An interpreter must therefore] join the practice he proposes to understand

• 上一篇：德克萨斯代写Assignment:右翼的反应
• 下一篇：美国德克萨斯代写作业:西方化