ASSIGNMENT代写

德克萨斯Assignment代写:数据保护指令

2017-03-24 11:22

总之,在与欧盟发出的数据保护指令有关的情况下,英国致力于保护所有形式的电子数据保护和数据保护的法律体系。关于隐私和数据的保护,英国,特别是英国法律,有保护个人信息和隐私权的传统,但没有具体的法律确保这一基本权利。正是这种情况导致了隐私权与表达自由之间的竞争局面。因此,我们必须建议,这两个概念都包含在特定的法律,所以他们有固有的权利的性质,而不是非常薄弱的公民自由。这是因为英国的法律是由欧洲人权法院案件的影响很大,但这两个概念的和解已被证明是非常困难的;但是隐私的概念必须正确权衡,表达自由,以及确保平等的原则是坚持和尊重的阶级或政治影响和经济学的概念不一样。总之,数据保护法1998;道格拉斯V您好[ 11 ]和雷诺兹案[ 12 ]已成为平衡这些权利的第一步,并保护公司所持有的个人资料。一个强大的国家和地区的法律主体是确保如果有新的信息时代和网络侵犯隐私权有一个充分的救济的重要;但这不应该被牺牲来表达自由作为雅虎V licra [ 13 ]所示,因为互联网是一个非常重要的媒体;传递和接收信息;而作为一个记者,作为对政府行为监督的个人论坛,经济学和政治学;因此,法律制度在本质上是更全面和整体的,考虑到所有影响法律尤其是涉及到基本权利和对个人内在自由[ 14 ]。这将导致一个引进的法律制度,平衡表达自由和个人的隐私权所建议的德国,但它需要是有效的,而不是一个空壳的程序法,而不是实体法。因此,有人认为,有必要促进法律制度,有效地平衡实体权利,这是在加拿大的情况
德克萨斯Assignment代写:数据保护指令
In conclusion in relation to the Data Protection directives as handed down by the EU, the UK has committed its legal system to the protection of electronic data protection and data protection in all forms. In relation to protection of privacy and data the UK, specifically English Law, has had a tradition of protecting personal information and the right to privacy; however there is no specific law ensuring this fundamental right. It has been this situation which has caused a situation of competition between the fundamental right of privacy and freedom of expression. Hence one would have to suggest that both these concepts are enshrined within specific laws, so they have the nature of inherent rights, rather than very weak civil liberties. This is because English law is greatly affected by the cases of the ECtHR, but the reconciliation of the two concepts has proved to be very difficult; however the concept of privacy has to be correctly balanced against that of the freedom of expression, as well as ensuring that the principle of equality is adhered to and not different in respect to the concept of class or the influences of politics and economics. In short the Data Protection Act 1998; Douglas v Hello[11]; and The Reynolds Case[12] have been the first step towards balancing these rights, and protecting personal data held by companies. A strong body of national and regional laws are important to ensure that there is a sufficient redress if there is an invasion of privacy in the new information age and cyberspace; but this should not be at the expense to the freedom of expression as illustrated in Yahoo v LICRA[13], because the Internet is a very important media; to impart and receive information; and as a forum for the press and the individual to act as a watchdog in relation to the acts of government, economics and politics; hence providing a system of law that is more rounded and holistic in nature, taking into account all influences on law especially in relation to the fundamental rights and freedoms inherent to the individual[14]. This leads one to introduce a system of law that balances freedom of expression and the individual’s right to privacy as suggested by Germany, but it needs to be effective rather than an empty shell of procedural law, rather than substantive law. Therefore one has to argue that it is necessary to promote a system of law that efficiently balances substantive rights as is the case in Canada