- Accounting Assignment 代写
- America Assignment 代写
- Anthropology Assignment 代写
- Architecture Assignment代写
- Arts Assignment 代写
- Biology Assignment 代写
- Business Assignment 代写
- Chemistry Assignment代写
- Commerce Assignment 代写
- Economics Assignment 代写
- Communications Assignment 代写
- Computer Science Assignment 代写
- Construction Assignment 代写
- Criminology Assignment 代写
- Cultural Studies Assignment 代写
- Economics Assignment 代写
- Education Assignment 代写
- Engineering Assignment 代写
- English Literature Assignment
- Environmental Sciences 代写
- Film Studies Assignment 代写
- Finance Assignment 代写
- General Studies Assignment 代写
- Health Assignment 代写
- History Assignment 代写
- Human Resource Assignment 代写
- Information Technology 代写
- It Research Assignment 代写
- Law Assignment 代写
- Management Assignment 代写
- Marketing Assignment 代写
- Media Assignment 代写
- Nursing Assignment 代写
- Philosophy Assignment 代写
- Physical Education Assignment
- Make My Assignment
- Politics Assignment代写
- Psychology Assignment 代写
- Religion Assignment 代写
- Sciences Assignment 代写
- Social Work Assignment 代写
- Sociology Assignment 代写
- Theology Assignment 代写
- Tourism Assignment 代写
- Weekly Studies 代写
- Dissertation 代写
- Coursework 代写
- 伊利诺Assignment代写
- 加州 Assignment 代写
- 普渡Assignment代写
- 东北大学代写Assignment
- 哥伦比亚代写Assignment
- 密歇根代写Assignment
- 俄亥俄代写Assignment
- 洛杉矶代写Assignment
- 印第安纳代写Assignment
- 伯克利代写Assignment
- 纽约代写Assignment
- 宾夕法尼亚代写Assignment
- 明尼苏达代写Assignment
- 西雅图代写Assignment
- 亚利桑那代写Assignment
- 波士顿代写Assignment
- 德克萨斯代写Assignment
- 康奈尔代写Assignment
- 哈佛代写Assignment
- 耶鲁代写Assignment
- 布朗代写Assignment
- 普林斯顿代写Assignment
- 达特茅斯代写Assignment
- 利物浦代写Assignment
- 曼彻斯特代写Assignment
- 诺丁汉代写Assignment
- 伯明翰代写assignment
- 谢菲尔德代写Assignment
- 南安普顿代写Assignment
- 纽卡斯尔代写Assignment
- 莱斯特代写Assignment
- 伦敦代写Assignment
- 东安格利亚代写Assignment
- 麦吉尔代写Assignment
- 邦德代写Assignment
- 温哥华代写Assignment
- 渥太华代写Assignment
- 查尔斯达尔文代写Assignment
- 蒙特利尔代写Assignment
- 阿尔伯塔代写Assignment
- 多伦多代写Assignment
- Auckland奥克兰代写Assignment
- 墨尔本RMIT代写Assignment
美国明尼苏达代写作业:教学及评核的看法
2019-04-05 02:32
本研究旨在调查幼稚园教师对课程、教学及评核的看法。数据收集采用开放式问卷、访谈和观察。阿拉伯联合酋长国的44名幼儿园教师回答了调查表;六名教师随后接受了采访。结果显示,一些教师认为,官方课程不适合发展,因为它更注重学术而不是儿童在社会、身体、情感和智力方面的发展。研究结果亦显示,这些幼稚园教师在发展上适当的做法并没有得到充分的认同,而他们的教学及评核实践强调使用直接的教学方法教授学术技巧。本研究显示,这些教师对幼儿园所教内容的满意度存在一定程度的模糊性。这种模糊性表现在教师的回答中;当被问及对幼儿园课堂内容的满意度时,大多数人持肯定态度。然而,与此同时,大多数教师承认,课程有很多负面的一面,这可能是这种模糊的原因。另一个原因可能是,在阿联酋,幼儿教育仍然处于过渡阶段,因为它正在从旧的体系向新的体系过渡。为增加和评估家长参与,实施了三项行动策略:(1)要求家长和孩子在家一起计划;(2)观察孩子在“计划-做-复习”期间的玩耍情况;(3)询问父母通过计划参与的情况。由于父母和孩子在家一起计划,制定了更明确的活动计划。计划在家庭和幼儿园继续进行和发展。在家规划导致了儿童、工作人员和父母之间的定期互动。工作人员报告说,家庭计划产生的“生活游戏”是基于孩子们自己的生活。美国明尼苏达代写作业:教学及评核的看法
Study aimed at investigating kindergarten teachers’ views of the curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Data were collected by an open-ended questionnaire, interviews, and observations. Forty-four kindergarten teachers in the United Arab Emirates responded to the questionnaire; six teachers were later interviewed. Results revealed that some teachers believe that the official curriculum is not developmentally appropriate, as it focuses more on academics rather than on child development in social, physical, emotional, and intellectual aspects. Results also revealed that the vision of developmentally appropriate practices among these kindergarten teachers has not been well-acknowledged and that their instructional and assessment practices emphasize teaching academic skills, using a direct instructional approach. This study shows revealed that there is a degree of ambiguity among these teachers about their satisfaction with what is introduced to children in kindergarten. This ambiguity appears in the teachers’ responses; the majority was positive when asked about their level of satisfaction regarding what is introduced in the kindergarten classroom. At the same time, however, the majority of the teachers conceded that there are many negative sides of the curriculum this might be the reason behind this ambiguity. Another reason might be that in the UAE, early childhood education is still in the transition stage, as it is moving from the old system to the new one.Bridge.H.,(2001) his study obsereved that children often parents involvement planned rich play activities that were connected to their home culture. Three action strategies were implemented to increase and evaluate parental involvement: (1) ask parents and children to plan together at home; (2) observe children’s play during ‘Plan-do-Review’ time; (3) ask parents about their involvement through planning. As a result of parents and children planning together at home, clearer plans of activity were produced. Plans were continued and developed at both home and preschool. Planning at home resulted in a regular pattern of interaction between children, staff and parents. Staff reported that planning at home produced ‘living play’ that was based upon children’s own lives.
COPYRIGHT © 2016 ASSIGNMENT HELP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. OUR SERVICE PROVIDED WILL BE USED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESEARCH.网站统计