密歇根代写Assignment:塞浦路斯教育

2018-07-21 05:11

本作业由两部分组成。第一部分，结合笔者在塞浦路斯教育体系中所熟悉的校长角色，对学院式领导模式和形式式领导模式进行了思考和比较。班主任的角色将分析两种领导风格。在第二部分中，作者着重分析了对学校组织及其价值观的假设，并以学院式和形式式的领导为代表。本作业以作者对领导力的理解为基础，从理论和实践两方面对这两种模型的考虑得出结论。根据Pashiardis(1995)的说法，塞浦路斯的教育系统有一个官僚结构，学校校长总是试图满足官僚而不是学生和家长的需要。每件事都必须以预先确定的方式来做，这几乎不会给错误留下任何空间，也不会给偏离主流留下任何余地。这是选择正式领导模式的主要原因。管理的大部分要素都符合塞浦路斯教育制度的官僚结构。另一方面，在学校领导模式下，每个学校的管理机构都可以自由设置额外的目标和目标，这不仅有利于学校社区，也有利于教育的质量。
密歇根代写Assignment:塞浦路斯教育
This assignment consists of two parts. In the first part, the models of collegial and formal type of leadership are considered and compared to the head teacher's role to which the author is familiar within the educational system of Cyprus. The head teacher's role will be analysed both leadership styles. In the second part, the author concentrates on the assumptions made about the school organization and its values with the collegial and formal types of leadership. The assignment ends with a conclusion based on the author's understanding of leadership that emerges from a consideration of both theory and practice in relation to these two models.According to Pashiardis (1995) the educational system in Cyprus has a bureaucratic structure and school principals are constantly trying to satisfy the bureaucrats rather than the needs of students and parents. Everything must be done in a pre-determined manner, which hardly leaves any space for errors or gives leeway for deviation from the mainstream. This is the main reason why the formal model of leadership is being chosen. Most of the elements of management fit into the bureaucratic structure of the Cypriot educational system. On the other hand, within the collegial model of leadership the governing body of each school is free to set additional aims and objectives that would not only benefit the school community but also the quality of the education offered.

• 上一篇：密歇根代写Assignment:主动学习
• 下一篇：美国密歇根代写Assignment:定量研究的选择