美国密歇根代写Assignment:定量比较方法

2018-01-24 23:25

在主流社会科学中，使用定量的比较方法显然是有好处的，但是，Ragin(1989)提出了在应用定量比较方法时，比较主义者所获得的七个优势。首先，comparitivts现在配备了一种方法，可以让他们在瞬间研究大量的案例。此外，它使这些研究人员能够增加审查的数量，而这并不需要大量的实地知识;尽管对该领域有所了解，但这将提高这种方法的质量。其次，它激发了一种新的意识，在一致的定量跨国家数据。这种认识是有价值的，因为测量可以更精确地检验假设的实现。对社会构成的描述的量化，为分析各种各样的案例之间的相互作用提供了基础。第三，它允许调查人员在测试理论时更仔细地考虑替代解释。第四，比较主义者现在可以从各个国家的数据基的各个大截面获得信息。第五，通过运用定量比较的方法，研究人员在创造科学概括的过程中;由于引进的量化程序是传统的主流社会科学的传统设计。第六，在面对若干矛盾的情况时，它减少了某些比较者对具体解释的倾向。最后，研究了使用统计控制程序的机会(Ragin 1989)。一项定量比较研究的例子将是Bronschier和其他(1978)对发达国家的研究，这些国家拥有先进水平的地方投资经济增长更快。
美国密歇根代写Assignment:定量比较方法
The use of the quantitative comparative approach is advantageous obviously for the same reasons mentioned for the use of the quantitative approach in mainstream social science, however Ragin (1989) has presented seven advantages that compartivists derive when they apply the quantitative comparative approach. Firstly, comparitivts are now equipped with an approach that allows them to study a large number of cases at an instant. Furthermore, it allows these researchers to increase the quantity the amount of scrutiny which does not require a great amount of knowledge of the field; despite having knowledge of the field would improve the quality of this approach. Secondly, it has stimulated a novel awareness in consistent quantitative cross-national data. This awareness is valuable because measuring permits more precise examination of the hypothesis to be achieved. Quantification of description of societal composition presents a foundation for analysing a wide range of conjectures concerning the interaction among cases. Thirdly, it allows investigators to consider alternative explanations more carefully when testing a theory. Fourthly, comparativists now have access to information from various a large cross sections of countries data bases. Fifthly, through the application of the quantitative comparative approach, researchers have now when creating scientific generalisations; since the quantitative procedures that have been introduced are conventional like the traditional design in mainstream social science. Sixthly, it has reduced the inclination between some comparativits to appreciate specific elucidations when confronted with several contradictory situations. And finally it has given researches the opportunity to use procedures of statistical control (Ragin 1989). An example of a quantitative comparative study would be Bronschier and others (1978) study of developed countries that had an advanced level of local investment economies grew quicker.